will look at it after work and report back
Cu Selur
Try whether it helps to use 64bit instead of 32 Avisynth, by setting "Config->Internals->Avisynth->Avisynth type" to "64bit".
In case you have an NVIDIA or Intel GPU you might also want to set "Config->Filtering->Avisynth->Libav hardware decoding mode".
Also enabling GPU in interframe might help to free some cpu ressources and speed things up.
+ Yes, UHD filtering especially Interframe is really slow.
+ Why are you treating the source as if it was TFF, it's progressive,...
+ Lowering the thread count ("Filtering->Avisynth->Misc->Scripts->Miscelleaneous->MT-Threads") to 2 seems to help a lot here, otherwise Avisynth seems to have issues handling the memory on UHD content. (works fine in Vapoursynth)
Cu Selur
Ps.: Depending on your system using Vapoursynth might be faster. + Source seems somehow causing
PPs.: I adjusted the Thread title.
(progressive) when changing FPS using qtmc-tff and +interframe or +rife-app 4.6 "false" = fps becomes very smooth and beautiful
(27.11.2023, 15:42)Selur Wrote: [ -> ]Try whether it helps to use 64bit instead of 32 Avisynth, by setting "Config->Internals->Avisynth->Avisynth type" to "64bit".
this means your message that Hybrid only works in a 64-bit environment is a lie
THANK you very much! in this mode x64 - it works even faster hahahahaha
this profile 422 works too!
Quote:this means your message that Hybrid only works in a 64-bit environment is a lie
*gig* running one tool in 32bit mode isn't the same as running Hybrid and all tools in 32bit
Quote:THANK you very much! in this mode x64 - it works even faster hahahahaha
Vapoursynth probably runs even faster.
Cu Selur
yes - when processing QTGMC or InterFrame - Vapoursynth is faster but Avisynth "details" better - compared 2 videos with the same settings QTGMC and Interframe - Avisynth took a little longer to process but the image and FPS are better =)))))
Not my experience, but if it's like that for you, good.
Cu Selur