This is a section, I cut for focus on the mess, the original is a wmv 640x480 at 29fps..dont know if its interlaced or progressive, mediainfo dont tell, but probably progressive
At first I thought it was a problem of frame bad interlaced but dont know...
Ok made some test with antialiasing santiag nnedi3 and look good, not almost perfect and stable but maybe is the solution, but confused of what value use, 8x6, 16x6, 8x4, 16x4..maybe the one with 16...
day by day maybe something I learnĀ
Not sure whether the doc helps:
Code:
nsize -
Sets the size of the local neighborhood around each pixel that is used by the predictor
neural network. Possible settings (x_diameter x y_diameter):
0 - 8x6
1 - 16x6
2 - 32x6
3 - 48x6
4 - 8x4
5 - 16x4
6 - 32x4
For image enlargement it is recommended to use 0 or 4. Larger y_diameter settings
will result in sharper output. For deinterlacing larger x_diameter settings will
allow connecting lines of smaller slope. However, what setting to use really
depends on the amount of aliasing (lost information) in the source. If the source was
heavily low-pass filtered before interlacing then aliasing will be low and a large
x_diameter setting wont be needed, and vice versa.
Default: 6 (int)
Cu Selur