![]() |
|
Deoldify Vapoursynth filter - Printable Version +- Selur's Little Message Board (https://forum.selur.net) +-- Forum: Talk, Talk, Talk (https://forum.selur.net/forum-5.html) +--- Forum: Small Talk (https://forum.selur.net/forum-7.html) +--- Thread: Deoldify Vapoursynth filter (/thread-3595.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
|
RE: Deoldify Vapoursynth filter - Selur - 24.01.2026 I keep the settings and just change the 'ColorModel' value.
RE: Deoldify Vapoursynth filter - Dan64 - 24.01.2026 As explained in the user guide, now the DeOldify version of "Artistic" and "Stable" are merged at 50% with model "Video" to improve the stability of these models. So now are at least 50% more similar to "Video" model. The blending using another model will smooth further the differences. If you want to see the difference is better to selected the single color model. See attached images. Dan RE: Deoldify Vapoursynth filter - Selur - 24.01.2026 Hmm,.. there is a difference between deoldify vs ddcolor, but none inside these categories deoldify: https://imgsli.com/NDQ0OTY5 https://imgsli.com/NDQ0OTcx dd: https://imgsli.com/NDQ0OTcw bug if you say this is to be expected that is fine. ![]() Cu Selur RE: Deoldify Vapoursynth filter - Dan64 - 24.01.2026 I can see that there are very little differences, but I was expecting more visible differences, your results are unexpected. Please try the scripts included in the attached zip archive and let me know if you get the same results of images included. Dan RE: Deoldify Vapoursynth filter - Selur - 24.01.2026 Those outputs look different as I would have expected. tile.TR_ddcolor_comp: ![]() tile.TR_deoldify_comp: ![]() Cu Selur RE: Deoldify Vapoursynth filter - Selur - 24.01.2026 tile.TR_deoldify_comp, changing: # clip_col = havc.HAVC_main(clip=clip, Preset="slower", ColorModel=models[i], ColorTemp="none", ColorFix="none", FrameInterp=0, ColorMap="none", ColorTune="none", BlackWhiteTune="none", EnableDeepEx=False)Error on frame 0 request:adjusting tile.TR_ddcolor_comp the same way, also throws an error: Error on frame 0 request:=> will try whether rebooting the system helps => no same output Cu Selur RE: Deoldify Vapoursynth filter - Selur - 24.01.2026 using: clip_col = havc.HAVC_main(clip=clip, Preset="veryslow", ColorModel=models[i], CombMethod="Luma-Masked", VideoTune="verystable", ColorTemp="none", ColorFix="none", ColorTune="none", BlackWhiteTune="none")ColorTemp="none"ColorTemp="very high"![]() the outputs look more similar. Cu Selur RE: Deoldify Vapoursynth filter - Dan64 - 24.01.2026 The parameter ColorTemp is used to apply a temporal color stabilization. Using ColorTemp='Very High' it is expected that the differences between the different color models is smoothed. Even using the more crazier color model, with ColorTemp='Very High', the colors will be tamed (stabilized). Try using ColorTemp='Low', you should see some more difference. Dan P.S. Updated the HAVC User Guide with ColorTemp explanation. RE: Deoldify Vapoursynth filter - Selur - 24.01.2026 Will try later and report back. RE: Deoldify Vapoursynth filter - Selur - 25.01.2026 Yes, as expected using low temp stability (or none) does lead to more differences: https://imgsli.com/NDQ1MTgz Cu Selur |