Esxi running macos For selur - Printable Version +- Selur's Little Message Board (https://forum.selur.net) +-- Forum: Talk, Talk, Talk (https://forum.selur.net/forum-5.html) +--- Forum: Small Talk (https://forum.selur.net/forum-7.html) +--- Thread: Esxi running macos For selur (/thread-1495.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
|
RE: Esxi running macos For selur - Selur - 30.03.2021 The 'experimental'-option combines some otherwise disabled options. There are a bunch of undocumented (and a bunch of undocumented and not working) misc.ini options, but I'm not planning to change anything about those options. Since I do not plan to support custom window sizing, I do not plan to add anything in that regard. I was once planning to add a fullscreen-option, but dropped it for the time being. -> I know that you want to freely resize the window size, but like I wrote before that is probably not happening. Cu Selur RE: Esxi running macos For selur - shijan - 30.03.2021 But why? Current "experimental" window resize works very well. It is even better than window resize in legacy Hybrid versions because it don't change window size to default when i switch to upper row of tabs. Fullscreen also subjectively works very well. Very useful when used on secondary display. By the way, do you think Hybrid_2021.03.30 stable enough? Is is worth to update installer package with it? Or don't hurry and wait for future releases? RE: Esxi running macos For selur - Selur - 30.03.2021 a. There are still quite a few things broken with resizing and fullscreen, especially since quite a bit of it uses legacy code which, from what I read will not be usable in the next MacOS. b. There are tons of problems with different themes under Linux, Windows and Mac. -> not changing the default behavior any time soon. Quote:By the way, do you think Hybrid_2021.03.30 stable enough? Is is worth to update installer package with it? Or don't hurry and wait for future releases?short: wait longer: There are still a bunch of bugs in it which I haven't had time to fix or look deeper into. Also I haven't looked into updating all the tools. (especially the encoders) Currently I plan to get a new public release ready end of this week. Cu Selur RE: Esxi running macos For selur - shijan - 30.03.2021 Ok, got it. Back to bug (or not a bug) with incorrect duration. I done some tests with file "Test Patterns Resolve 422 HQ.mov" (original duration 600ms): Rendered to ProRes mov - Incorrect duration. Rendered to Cineform mov - Incorrect duration. Rendered to x264 mov - no problem. Rendered to x264 mp4 - no problem. Rendered to ProRes mkv - no problem. Rendered to Cineform avi - no problem. So i guess there is a problem somewhere in FFmpeg or in Hybrid. RE: Esxi running macos For selur - Selur - 30.03.2021 Can't reproduce this here. None of the files from https://www.dropbox.com/sh/bak63hnr7mnpgbj/AAAf-rMK0LvHYTAFjPuQaaxFa?dl=0 are reported by mediainfo with Duration_Lastframe-info. You didn't share any debug output so I don't even know what command lines are used. No clue what's happening. -> You are on your own on that one. Quote:"Test Patterns Resolve 422 HQ.mov"I don't have that file. Only similar named file would be 'Test Patterns Resolve 422 HQ 10-bit.mov' Quote:So i guess there is a problem somewhere in FFmpeg or in Hybrid.or your file is simply flagged in a wrong way Cu Selur RE: Esxi running macos For selur - Selur - 30.03.2021 Ahhh,... okay, reencoding 'Test Patterns Resolve 422 HQ 10-bit.mov' with ProRes created a file with the 'Druation_LastFrame' info. The whole time I understood it that the input had this info not the output,... ffmpeg -y -noautorotate -nostdin -threads 8 -ignore_editlist true -i "C:\Users\Selur\Desktop\ProRes Examples 10 12 bit\Test Patterns Resolve 422 HQ 10-bit.mov" -map 0:0 -an -sn -pix_fmt yuv422p10le -strict -1 -vsync 0 -vcodec prores_ks -profile:v 3 -vtag apch -metadata encoding_tool="Hybrid 2021.03.30.1" -f mov "E:\Output\Test Patterns Resolve 422 HQ 10-bit_2021-03-30@16_23_34_1710_01.mov" During the reencoding ffmpeg reports: [mov @ 00000108f32800c0] Application provided duration: -9223372036854775808 / timestamp: -9223372036854775808 is out of range for mov/mp4 format (when reencoding to a non ffmpeg based encoder, only the frames are used not the time codes) There is probably an additional ffmpeg-option to fix this,.. Cu Selur RE: Esxi running macos For selur - shijan - 30.03.2021 It is same as "Test Patterns Resolve 422 HQ 10-bit.mov" i just renamed it on computer. It was no problem with old version of FFmpeg and Hybrid. I will test different combinations of FFmpeg and Hybrid Here is debug. Hybrid_dev_2021.03.30 + ffmpeg-101748-g797c2ecc8f 2021-03-28 RE: Esxi running macos For selur - Selur - 30.03.2021 Read my last post again. Problem might be that ffmpeg keeps some sort of time code track. Cu Selur RE: Esxi running macos For selur - shijan - 30.03.2021 Ok, hope it will be some fix for this. I don't like when ffmpeg changes file duration like this under the hood RE: Esxi running macos For selur - Selur - 30.03.2021 Problem seems to be the '-vsync 0' option: Quote:-vsync parametersource: https://www.ffmpeg.org/ffmpeg-all.html When removing the option (which then uses '-vsync -1') everything seems fine. -> Seems like the way how ffmpeg reacts to broken time codes in the input has changed. Cu Selur |