![]() |
Deoldify Vapoursynth filter - Printable Version +- Selur's Little Message Board (https://forum.selur.net) +-- Forum: Talk, Talk, Talk (https://forum.selur.net/forum-5.html) +--- Forum: Small Talk (https://forum.selur.net/forum-7.html) +--- Thread: Deoldify Vapoursynth filter (/thread-3595.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
|
RE: Deoldify Vapoursynth filter - Selur - 08.02.2025 Uploaded a new Hybrid_deoldify, which hopefully works as intended with 7 methods for 'Exemplar Models'. Cu Selur RE: Deoldify Vapoursynth filter - Dan64 - 08.02.2025 I attached the new RC6 with management of 7 methods. Using the last dev version I get the following errors FilteringModel get->found no field 'vsHAVCDeepExOnlyRefs' FilteringModel get->found no field 'vsHAVCPreset' FilteringModel get->found no field 'vsHAVCColorTune' FilteringModel get->found no field 'vsHAVCColorMap' FilteringModel get->found no field 'vsHAVCDeepExMethod' FilteringModel get->found no field 'vsHAVCDeepExPreset' FilteringModel get->found no field 'vsHAVCDeepExRefMerge' FilteringModel get->found no field 'vsHAVCDeepExOnlyRefs' FilteringModel get->found no field 'vsHAVCSceneFramedir' FilteringModel get->found no field 'vsHAVCScThtOffset' FilteringModel get->found no field 'vsHAVCScMinInt' FilteringModel get->found no field 'vsHAVCSCNormalize' FilteringModel get->found no field 'vsHAVCDeepExModel' FilteringModel get->found no field 'vsHAVCDeepExVivid' FilteringModel get->found no field 'vsHAVCDeepExMethod' FilteringModel get->found no field 'vsHAVCDeepExFrames' moreover the generated script is incomplete, probably due to the previous errors Dan RE: Deoldify Vapoursynth filter - Selur - 08.02.2025 Didn't implement FilterQueue support. Will look at it. RE: Deoldify Vapoursynth filter - Selur - 08.02.2025 Uploaded a new Hybrid_deoldify which hopefully fixes the problem. Cu Selur RE: Deoldify Vapoursynth filter - Dan64 - 08.02.2025 Now it's better, but Ref Merge is set always to "no" is not possible to select a different value even if is enabled. Dan RE: Deoldify Vapoursynth filter - Selur - 08.02.2025 Doh, I accidentally set it to know whenever it got enabled, not when it got disabled. ![]() Uploaded a new Hybrid_deoldify version. Cu Selur RE: Deoldify Vapoursynth filter - Dan64 - 08.02.2025 Now Ref merge is Ok. But the section of file is enabled only for method 6, while should be enabled also for method 5. EDIT: please rename on the GUI the following methods 5 = HAVC restore same as video --> to rename in: external ClipRef same as video 6 = HAVC restore different from video --> to rename in: external ClipRef different from video Dan RE: Deoldify Vapoursynth filter - Selur - 08.02.2025 Quote: But the section of file is enabled only for method 6, while should be enabled also for method 5.i adjusted
Updated Hybrid_deoldify. Cu Selur RE: Deoldify Vapoursynth filter - Selur - 08.02.2025 Quote:EDIT:I totally don't get it the whole meaning of those options, but will do,.... values << "HAVC"; Cu Selur RE: Deoldify Vapoursynth filter - Dan64 - 08.02.2025 (08.02.2025, 19:23)Selur Wrote:Quote: But the section of file is enabled only for method 6, while should be enabled also for method 5.i adjusted DeepExRefMerge to be set 'no' for all external model methods not having RF same as video, which are: 2, 4, 6 <--- TO BE FIXED The change of the names is to clarify better the source of Exemplar Models, which are models that are able to colorize a movie only if is provided a colored regerence image. Previously were available 2 type of colored images: internal (provided by the picture color models implemented in HAVC) and external (external image files). With HAVC 5.0 has been extended the external source of colored images to video clip. This extension was mainly added for restoring colored videos, but I preferred remove the HAVC prefix, because the clip could be generated by a different coloring model. Thanks, Dan |