![]() |
Disable deinterlace - Printable Version +- Selur's Little Message Board (https://forum.selur.net) +-- Forum: Hybrid - Support (https://forum.selur.net/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Problems & Questions (https://forum.selur.net/forum-3.html) +--- Thread: Disable deinterlace (/thread-1375.html) |
Disable deinterlace - Nero - 22.05.2020 Hi. I would like to know if there's no way to disable the deinterlacer. Before there was the possibility to select ''none'', but I can no longer see it in the latest version of hybrid. Regards RE: Disable deinterlace - Selur - 22.05.2020 that's a bug, but if you simply disable auto deinterlacing or configure the output format to encode to interlaced output Hybrid won't deinterlace. RE: Disable deinterlace - Nero - 22.05.2020 Alright, thanks for the answer. If I may, I have another question (not related to that). Is Jinc resizer not present in hybrid? I couldn't find it. Regards RE: Disable deinterlace - Selur - 23.05.2020 Nope, I don't use it, nobody ever requested it. -> not supported atm. RE: Disable deinterlace - Nero - 23.05.2020 It would be nice to see it in future releases, if possible. It gives a pretty nice quality. ![]() Take a look at your spare time: http://avisynth.nl/index.php/JincResize Thanks. RE: Disable deinterlace - Selur - 24.05.2020 I did some small tests and now I remember why I don't like JicResize: a. it eats lots of RAM b. it causes quite a bit of ringing but I can add support for it, may be there is a scenario where people really use this. Cu Selur RE: Disable deinterlace - Selur - 24.05.2020 I checked my old code and comments, I removed 'none' since it was unnecessary. The normal intended behavior is: a. when 'auto' is enabled: Hybrid will deinterlaced if the input isn't progressive and 'Force' is disabled b. when 'Force' is enabled: Hybrid will always deinterlace depending independent of the scan type Cu Selur RE: Disable deinterlace - Nero - 24.05.2020 Quote:but I can add support for it, may be there is a scenario where people really use this.Thank you very much for adding support to it. It's a bit hungry indeed, but in some sources it does a really good job. Quote:I checked my old code and comments, I removed 'none' since it was unnecessary.Quite plausible. Thanks for the explanation. |