![]() |
B-Frames do not appear in the log - Printable Version +- Selur's Little Message Board (https://forum.selur.net) +-- Forum: Hybrid - Support (https://forum.selur.net/forum-1.html) +--- Forum: Problems & Questions (https://forum.selur.net/forum-3.html) +--- Thread: B-Frames do not appear in the log (/thread-3052.html) |
B-Frames do not appear in the log - murriato - 23.01.2023 Hello Mr. Selur, I have seen that the information of the B-Frames does not appear in the encode log, before the B-Frames did slds RE: B-Frames do not appear in the log - Selur - 24.01.2023 Strange, normally everything that starts with 'x264 [info]' should end up in the log, will look at it this evening. Cu Selur RE: B-Frames do not appear in the log - Selur - 24.01.2023 Had a quick look. x264 only reports the 'x264 [info]: consecutive B-frames: ...'-line if the 'adaptive b-frame decision' (--b-adapt) is enabled. If x264 does report the line, Hybrid also reports it: raw [info]: 640x352p 1:1 @ 25/1 fps (cfr) Cu Selur RE: B-Frames do not appear in the log - murriato - 24.01.2023 In previous updates, the B-Frames were enabled by default. How can I reactivate the B-Frames? Because I don't know how to do it thank you sir selur I have the parameters in Hybrid like this I had an old version saved and when installing it without touching any parameters, the B-Frames appear RE: B-Frames do not appear in the log - Selur - 24.01.2023 Oh, I thought it was about x264. ![]() ![]() Seems like current x265 version do not report that info anymore. Using the command line I don't get this info any more. Cu Selur RE: B-Frames do not appear in the log - murriato - 25.01.2023 Hello Mr. Selur, could you include or fix the information on x265 [info]: consecutive B-frames thanks and slds ![]() RE: B-Frames do not appear in the log - Selur - 25.01.2023 No, if current x265 versions do not provide the information, I can not magically make it appear again. That would require to change the x265 source code. Cu Selur RE: B-Frames do not appear in the log - murriato - 25.01.2023 Ok thanks Mr. Selur I didn't know it was from the source code. ![]() ![]() |