![]() |
|
[INFO] Resize or downsize? - Printable Version +- Selur's Little Message Board (https://forum.selur.net) +-- Forum: Talk, Talk, Talk (https://forum.selur.net/forum-5.html) +--- Forum: Small Talk (https://forum.selur.net/forum-7.html) +--- Thread: [INFO] Resize or downsize? (/thread-4080.html) |
Resize or downsize? - Doom83 - 26.04.2025 When I have 720x480 in 4:3 file and make ffv1, better convert in 1:1 up in 720X540 or down at 640x480? Dont know whats the regular, according to the web the size are 640x480... Or need to leave at 720x480?
RE: Resize or downsize? - Selur - 26.04.2025 If you want/need a square pixel par, I would increase the width. If it's for archiving, I wouldn't change the par. (keeping the original as untouched as possible) RE: Resize or downsize? - Doom83 - 06.08.2025 Ok about the format I find 4:3 set 8x9 5:3 set 10x9 5:4 set 10x12 16:9 set 32x27 16:10 set 32x30 1,85:1 set 10x8 or 16x13 or 15X12 2,25:1 set 15x10 2,40:1 set 16x10 But what about 2,39:1? hybrid tell this RE: Resize or downsize? - Selur - 07.08.2025 There is no (MPEG-2, MPEG-4, ITU) standard for cinescope, but simple math tells me one should use a pixel aspect ratio of 239:125 (~1.912) for cine scope (DAR 2.39:1) content. Cu Selur |