Selur's Little Message Board
[INFO] deinterlacing: motion-adaptive vs. motion-compensating - Printable Version

+- Selur's Little Message Board (https://forum.selur.net)
+-- Forum: Talk, Talk, Talk (https://forum.selur.net/forum-5.html)
+--- Forum: A/V Talk (https://forum.selur.net/forum-6.html)
+--- Thread: [INFO] deinterlacing: motion-adaptive vs. motion-compensating (/thread-4149.html)



deinterlacing: motion-adaptive vs. motion-compensating - tailland - 13.07.2025

doing some deinterlacing, i decided to read up on some different methods: https://www.albalaing.es/faq/articulos/Deinterlacing%20Algorithms.pdf

is there a deinterlacing filter out there (maybe hybrid-embeddable?) which has motion-compensation?


RE: deinterlacing: motion-adaptive vs. motion-compensating - Selur - 13.07.2025

QTGMC by default uses motion compensation (leveraging mvtools) for deinterlacing. (old Avisynth MVBob and MCBob also used motion compensation)
Outside of Avisynth and Vapoursynth an example of a simple motion compensation deinterlacer would be mcdeint from ffmpeg.


Cu Selur

Ps.: Through the torch add-on Hybrid also supports https://github.com/pifroggi/vs_deepdeinterlace and https://github.com/anymyb/MFDIN for deinterlacing, which are additional methods.