![]() |
[INFO] deinterlacing: motion-adaptive vs. motion-compensating - Printable Version +- Selur's Little Message Board (https://forum.selur.net) +-- Forum: Talk, Talk, Talk (https://forum.selur.net/forum-5.html) +--- Forum: A/V Talk (https://forum.selur.net/forum-6.html) +--- Thread: [INFO] deinterlacing: motion-adaptive vs. motion-compensating (/thread-4149.html) |
deinterlacing: motion-adaptive vs. motion-compensating - tailland - 13.07.2025 doing some deinterlacing, i decided to read up on some different methods: https://www.albalaing.es/faq/articulos/Deinterlacing%20Algorithms.pdf is there a deinterlacing filter out there (maybe hybrid-embeddable?) which has motion-compensation? RE: deinterlacing: motion-adaptive vs. motion-compensating - Selur - 13.07.2025 QTGMC by default uses motion compensation (leveraging mvtools) for deinterlacing. (old Avisynth MVBob and MCBob also used motion compensation) Outside of Avisynth and Vapoursynth an example of a simple motion compensation deinterlacer would be mcdeint from ffmpeg. Cu Selur Ps.: Through the torch add-on Hybrid also supports https://github.com/pifroggi/vs_deepdeinterlace and https://github.com/anymyb/MFDIN for deinterlacing, which are additional methods. |