Posts: 785
Threads: 16
Joined: Mar 2020
Just the idea:
- keep old single row VS tabs.
- shorten some names (DeBlocker -> DeBlock) to save some space. You may just divide groups
- add subgroups if required.
- divide filter sub groups inside each tabs with line or with shades of grey
Posts: 10.553
Threads: 57
Joined: May 2017
I will think about it.
That may end up with sub-groups one visible when scrolling down.
----
Dev versions are in the 'experimental'-folder of my GoogleDrive, which is linked on the download page.
Posts: 785
Threads: 16
Joined: Mar 2020
Another very common option is sup groups with arrows to hide and show them. But in most cases i have no idea why hide those subgroups.
For example this is how it looks in PhotoLine image editor:
Posts: 10.553
Threads: 57
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 10.553
Threads: 57
Joined: May 2017
Any idea what could caus TeamViewer preview to be distorted like this?
Restarted and reinstalled TeamViewer, but the distorted view is still present.
Cu Selur
----
Dev versions are in the 'experimental'-folder of my GoogleDrive, which is linked on the download page.
Posts: 785
Threads: 16
Joined: Mar 2020
Posts: 10.553
Threads: 57
Joined: May 2017
Personally, I prefer
but if more users report that they prefer the other view I can adjust Hybrid.
Cu Selur
----
Dev versions are in the 'experimental'-folder of my GoogleDrive, which is linked on the download page.
Posts: 785
Threads: 16
Joined: Mar 2020
Organization vs speed:
Four rows tabs structure looks more accurate and each sub group looks well separated.
Cons:
It require more clicks to reach each filter.
impossible to check quickly globally which filters are enabled or disabled.
3 rows tabs structure allow very fast navigation across all sub grouped filters with scroll. Easy to inspect quickly which filters are selected or deselected.
Cons:
Layout visually look less pretty and less accurate.
In some tabs too long filters list may be not too easy to scroll inside too slim window height.
Question about a bluray
It is the movie oklahoma! 1955
It is apparently filmed at 30 FPS (made in 1955 and they were experimenting with frame rates)
It was remastered for the bluray.
But bluray spec doesn’t have 1080p/30 only
So they made it interlaced 1080i/59.94 (i wonder if they doubled the frame rate and labeled them as fields? And then encoded them as interlaced?)
When i get info it shows up as 1080i/29.97 on the avc file.
I think i can get it back to 1080p/30 fps.
Using qtgmc to double the frames followed by srestore frate=30.
Interesting thing is. The video isn’t combed. Like it doesn’t look interlaced when playing the raw m2ts file.
I think that is causing qtgmc to fail because it isn’t truly interlaced.
Any advice would be helpful. Thanks
Video
ID : 1
Format : AVC
Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec
Format profile : High@L4.1
Format settings, CABAC : Yes
Format settings, ReFrames : 4 frames
Codec ID : V_MPEG4/ISO/AVC
Duration : 2 h 28 min
Bit rate mode : Variable
Maximum bit rate : 38.5 Mb/s
Width : 1 920 pixels
Height : 1 080 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 16:9
Frame rate mode : Constant
Frame rate : 29.970 (30000/1001) FPS
Color space : YUV
Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
Bit depth : 8 bits
Scan type : MBAFF
Scan type, store method : Interleaved fields
Scan order : Top Field First
Language : English
Default : No
Forced : No