11.09.2021, 11:35
At least we can see that FFV1 is fast and effectively reduce file size if there is no grain.
FFV1 is faster and more effective than x264 Lossless.
Cineform "Visually Lossless" is extremely fast and size vs quality may be adjusted in very large limits. FS modes are "Film Scan" they where introduced as maximum possible visually lossless quality modes that preserve grainy film and video structure.
ProRes 422HQ 10-bit is "Visually Lossless" but same time 1.8-1.9 less in size than x264 "Real Lossless" 422 10-bit
Upscaling bit depth and chroma sampling increases file size a lot.
By the way, as it was noticed earlier - standalone filter for Hybrid that allow to change bit depth and chroma sampling may be useful option.
FFV1 is faster and more effective than x264 Lossless.
Cineform "Visually Lossless" is extremely fast and size vs quality may be adjusted in very large limits. FS modes are "Film Scan" they where introduced as maximum possible visually lossless quality modes that preserve grainy film and video structure.
ProRes 422HQ 10-bit is "Visually Lossless" but same time 1.8-1.9 less in size than x264 "Real Lossless" 422 10-bit
Upscaling bit depth and chroma sampling increases file size a lot.
By the way, as it was noticed earlier - standalone filter for Hybrid that allow to change bit depth and chroma sampling may be useful option.