This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.
Selur's Little Message Board › Talk, Talk, Talk › Small Talk v
Codec Speed vs Size Tests

Linear Mode
Codec Speed vs Size Tests
Selur Offline
the author
*******
Posts: 10.598
Threads: 57
Joined: May 2017
#6
11.09.2021, 12:04
Not x264, H.264.
One is an encoder the other is a format.
Quote:Original Apple ProRes transcoding is way faster than FFmpeg ProRes
Speed of H.264 encoding and decoding is also a lot faster if you use a hardware encoder.

Cu Selur
----
Dev versions are in the 'experimental'-folder of my GoogleDrive, which is linked on the download page.
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Codec Speed vs Size Tests - by shijan - 11.09.2021, 11:11
RE: Codec Speed vs Size Tests - by Selur - 11.09.2021, 11:15
RE: Codec Speed vs Size Tests - by shijan - 11.09.2021, 11:35
RE: Codec Speed vs Size Tests - by Selur - 11.09.2021, 11:47
RE: Codec Speed vs Size Tests - by shijan - 11.09.2021, 12:01
RE: Codec Speed vs Size Tests - by Selur - 11.09.2021, 12:04
RE: Codec Speed vs Size Tests - by shijan - 11.09.2021, 14:49

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)