This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Optical flow using Hybrid -- Possible?
#15
A source clip can have flags regarding whether they are interlaced or not, but like the normal interlaced info it often is not reliable.
If you call
ffprobe -i "<path to input>" -show_frames
you get data like:
[FRAME]
media_type=video
stream_index=0
key_frame=0
pts=149673
pts_time=1.663033
pkt_dts=151473
pkt_dts_time=1.683033
best_effort_timestamp=149673
best_effort_timestamp_time=1.663033
pkt_duration=1800
pkt_duration_time=0.020000
pkt_pos=532604
pkt_size=87443
width=1920
height=1080
pix_fmt=yuv420p
sample_aspect_ratio=1:1
pict_type=P
coded_picture_number=5
display_picture_number=0
interlaced_frame=1
top_field_first=1
repeat_pict=0
color_range=tv
color_space=bt709
color_primaries=bt709
color_transfer=bt709
chroma_location=left
[/FRAME]
Some deinterlacers use these,...
Problem is that just because a frame is interlaced, doesn't mean it shows combing. Sometimes progressive input is encoded with an interlaced flag or telecined contend it flagged as progressive or vise versa.

Cu Selur
----
Dev versions are in the 'experimental'-folder of my GoogleDrive, which is linked on the download page.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Optical flow using Hybrid -- Possible? - by Selur - 29.09.2021, 05:38

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)