short answer: No
longer answer:
No, since that would require either:
a. running the whole thing inside a virtual environment with it's own memory management
(that would seriously degrade performance)
b. every program used able to drop and reload it's memory and state
(probably never going to happen, since it's not really easy to code such stuff especially with complex stuff like encoders)
c. some sort of chuncked encoding that
(that would hurt quality, but is probably the only way to archive something like this realistically)
Also: if you ever scream again, it will be the last time I answered any question since I do this in my free time as a hobby and don't plan to deal with folks that scream at me.
(This time I adjusted your all-caps posting.)
Cu Selur
longer answer:
No, since that would require either:
a. running the whole thing inside a virtual environment with it's own memory management
(that would seriously degrade performance)
b. every program used able to drop and reload it's memory and state
(probably never going to happen, since it's not really easy to code such stuff especially with complex stuff like encoders)
c. some sort of chuncked encoding that
(that would hurt quality, but is probably the only way to archive something like this realistically)
Also: if you ever scream again, it will be the last time I answered any question since I do this in my free time as a hobby and don't plan to deal with folks that scream at me.
(This time I adjusted your all-caps posting.)
Cu Selur
----
Dev versions are in the 'experimental'-folder of my GoogleDrive, which is linked on the download page.
Dev versions are in the 'experimental'-folder of my GoogleDrive, which is linked on the download page.