This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

[BUG] Maintaining Interlace On Output
#4
No, FFV1 isn't a bad archival format, it just doesn't differentiate between interlaced and progressive data.
The best way to fix this is for me to add a dummy selection to the FFV1 encoder which lets the user decide whether wants interlaced or progressive data to be saved.
Since this will influence how Hybrid does filtering.
If you don't do any filtering overwriting the input scan type to progressive should be fine too.

Cu Selur
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Maintaining Interlace On Output - by Analog - 19.04.2022, 07:08
RE: Maintaining Interlace On Output - by Selur - 19.04.2022, 08:37
RE: Maintaining Interlace On Output - by kazi - 14.01.2024, 13:16
RE: Maintaining Interlace On Output - by kazi - 14.01.2024, 15:49
RE: Maintaining Interlace On Output - by kazi - 14.01.2024, 19:22
RE: Maintaining Interlace On Output - by kazi - 14.01.2024, 21:11
RE: Maintaining Interlace On Output - by kazi - 15.01.2024, 00:43

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 8 Guest(s)