I uploaded a new 'scale'-option to the masking, which scales the pixel values by a factor.
Also, please use another image hoster in the future, since my firewall and MalwareBytes go crazy whenever I click on one of the linked images.
Since gamma changes, do the following: they apply x^1/γ, where x is the input pixel value and γ is the gamma value. I'm not sold on the need for an additional gamma adjustment.
(Applying gamma and a scaling factor would be "x^1/γ * scale" or (x*scale)^1/γ) depending on the order those are combined.)
Maybe I'll add an option for users to apply a custom 'expr'-expression to masks, if need be, but since I personally don't really like using reverse polish notation, that is unlikely atm.
Cu Selur
Also, please use another image hoster in the future, since my firewall and MalwareBytes go crazy whenever I click on one of the linked images.
Since gamma changes, do the following: they apply x^1/γ, where x is the input pixel value and γ is the gamma value. I'm not sold on the need for an additional gamma adjustment.
(Applying gamma and a scaling factor would be "x^1/γ * scale" or (x*scale)^1/γ) depending on the order those are combined.)
Maybe I'll add an option for users to apply a custom 'expr'-expression to masks, if need be, but since I personally don't really like using reverse polish notation, that is unlikely atm.
Cu Selur
----
Dev versions are in the 'experimental'-folder of my GoogleDrive, which is linked on the download page.
Dev versions are in the 'experimental'-folder of my GoogleDrive, which is linked on the download page.