04.04.2025, 21:08
Dear Selur and Dan64,
First of all, thank you both for your feedback and for taking the time to look into this! I really appreciate the attention you’ve given to the test.
That being said, I have to disagree—I find DeepEnhancer to be significantly more effective than Spotless in my tests. The level of detail preservation and artifact reduction is much better.
If you’d like to try it yourself, here are the pre-trained models:
👉 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ViZjRQ9...sp=sharing
Also, Dan64, I wanted to mention that DeepEnhancer can also be used for colorization! Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to get the colorization script working on my side, but I’m sure you’d have no trouble with it. 😆 It looks very promising, and I’d love to hear your thoughts if you manage to test it.
I believe this could be a great addition to Hybrid, bringing even more value to its filtering options. Let me know what you think!
Best
First of all, thank you both for your feedback and for taking the time to look into this! I really appreciate the attention you’ve given to the test.
That being said, I have to disagree—I find DeepEnhancer to be significantly more effective than Spotless in my tests. The level of detail preservation and artifact reduction is much better.
If you’d like to try it yourself, here are the pre-trained models:
👉 https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ViZjRQ9...sp=sharing
Also, Dan64, I wanted to mention that DeepEnhancer can also be used for colorization! Unfortunately, I wasn’t able to get the colorization script working on my side, but I’m sure you’d have no trouble with it. 😆 It looks very promising, and I’d love to hear your thoughts if you manage to test it.
I believe this could be a great addition to Hybrid, bringing even more value to its filtering options. Let me know what you think!
Best