05.04.2025, 15:28
Hi,
I've noticed that DeepEnhancer performs better than BasicVSR_NTIRE when it comes to removing spots and blemishes—especially the larger ones often found in films from the 1920s, 30s, and 40s. It seems that BasicVSR_NTIRE may have been pre-trained on modern, cleaner footage, which makes it less effective on heavily damaged historical material.
In comparison, DeepEnhancer provides stronger results in terms of restoration. However, as our friend Selur pointed out, it can sometimes be a bit aggressive—so it's a matter of balancing use cases and fine-tuning.
Still, I'm really impressed with how well DeepEnhancer handles old footage!
Best regards,
I've noticed that DeepEnhancer performs better than BasicVSR_NTIRE when it comes to removing spots and blemishes—especially the larger ones often found in films from the 1920s, 30s, and 40s. It seems that BasicVSR_NTIRE may have been pre-trained on modern, cleaner footage, which makes it less effective on heavily damaged historical material.
In comparison, DeepEnhancer provides stronger results in terms of restoration. However, as our friend Selur pointed out, it can sometimes be a bit aggressive—so it's a matter of balancing use cases and fine-tuning.
Still, I'm really impressed with how well DeepEnhancer handles old footage!
Best regards,