14.04.2025, 19:30
Hi Selur,
Thank you very much for your detailed analysis and suggestions – I really appreciate your time and expertise!
It makes sense now that the source was likely interlaced originally and then bob deinterlaced with the wrong field order. Unfortunately, I don’t have access to the original source to re-capture it properly, but your explanation helps me understand the limitations I’m working with.
I’ll follow your advice and try throwing away half the frames with cycle "2" and offset "1", and possibly add interpolation if needed to keep the motion fluid. I’ll also test SpotLess with a temporal radius of 3 to clean up the remaining artifacts.
Thanks again for all your help – this gives me a much better direction to approach the restoration.
Best regards,
Thank you very much for your detailed analysis and suggestions – I really appreciate your time and expertise!
It makes sense now that the source was likely interlaced originally and then bob deinterlaced with the wrong field order. Unfortunately, I don’t have access to the original source to re-capture it properly, but your explanation helps me understand the limitations I’m working with.
I’ll follow your advice and try throwing away half the frames with cycle "2" and offset "1", and possibly add interpolation if needed to keep the motion fluid. I’ll also test SpotLess with a temporal radius of 3 to clean up the remaining artifacts.
Thanks again for all your help – this gives me a much better direction to approach the restoration.
Best regards,