Your screenshots of the settings are useless (at least to me).
Better either post your script (Vapoursynth Script View) or a debug output. (the script would show me if you use other filters additionally which might influence the effect of the suggested filtering)
![[Image: grafik.png]](https://i.ibb.co/LdtSKJrv/grafik.png)
![[Image: grafik.png]](https://i.ibb.co/S7fzynLG/grafik.png)
is what it looks to me. (unlike you, I didn't disable 'Link UV')
using 1x_BleedOut_Compact_300k_net_g does provide better results here, using 5694 (of the bobbed sample):
![[Image: grafik.png]](https://i.ibb.co/k29Gn2gq/grafik.png)
If you make screenshots of the content, use the option in vsViewer and also post the frame number that refers to the clip you shared, so I can compare it without having to search for it,..
Cu Selur
Ps.: just thought about boosting the saturation after the rainbowing, for testing how well it worked => looking some more at it
Better either post your script (Vapoursynth Script View) or a debug output. (the script would show me if you use other filters additionally which might influence the effect of the suggested filtering)
is what it looks to me. (unlike you, I didn't disable 'Link UV')
using 1x_BleedOut_Compact_300k_net_g does provide better results here, using 5694 (of the bobbed sample):
If you make screenshots of the content, use the option in vsViewer and also post the frame number that refers to the clip you shared, so I can compare it without having to search for it,..
Cu Selur
Ps.: just thought about boosting the saturation after the rainbowing, for testing how well it worked => looking some more at it
----
Dev versions are in the 'experimental'-folder of my GoogleDrive, which is linked on the download page.
Dev versions are in the 'experimental'-folder of my GoogleDrive, which is linked on the download page.