Yesterday, 10:40
Hello Selur,
using the R74 I compared the encoding speed of a 10min clip, using "core.num_threads = 1" vs "core.num_threads = 0" (no limitation on threads count).
Using only 1 thread I obtained a speed of about 5.28fps, while with no threads limitation I obtained a encoding speed of about 5.62 (see picture)
![[Image: attachment.php?aid=3617]](https://forum.selur.net/attachment.php?aid=3617)
So in this case, using only 1 thread the speed decreased only of about 6%. But while in R74 the correct thread management is performed automatically, in R76 now this management is left to the user, that need to guess when is necessary or not. I hope there are no further "improvements" of this kind in the new R76, which have not yet been discovered.
Dan
P.S.
I'm going to the rename the github project "vs-deoldify" in "vs-havc" and to rename the package "vsdeoldify" in "vshavc", in the next days I will provide you the preview of "vshavc" package
using the R74 I compared the encoding speed of a 10min clip, using "core.num_threads = 1" vs "core.num_threads = 0" (no limitation on threads count).
Using only 1 thread I obtained a speed of about 5.28fps, while with no threads limitation I obtained a encoding speed of about 5.62 (see picture)
So in this case, using only 1 thread the speed decreased only of about 6%. But while in R74 the correct thread management is performed automatically, in R76 now this management is left to the user, that need to guess when is necessary or not. I hope there are no further "improvements" of this kind in the new R76, which have not yet been discovered.
Dan
P.S.
I'm going to the rename the github project "vs-deoldify" in "vs-havc" and to rename the package "vsdeoldify" in "vshavc", in the next days I will provide you the preview of "vshavc" package

