15.04.2022, 16:12
The use cases I'm comparing and searching for now is simply how to reduce the size of the various video files (I'm running out of space between HDDs) while losing little quality (I'm choosing target vmaf 96) and not requiring months of processing.
Unfortunately aom, produces yes a better quality but takes me much more time (for now the minimum respecting that quality vmaf took me more than 10x the duration of the source).
Unfortunately aom, produces yes a better quality but takes me much more time (for now the minimum respecting that quality vmaf took me more than 10x the duration of the source).