This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

Codec Speed vs Size Tests
#2
Like I wrote before:
Quote:If you compare FFV1, ProRes,... you should look at these points:
  • support for different color samplings/color spaces
  • support for alpha channel
  • availability of hardware encoding
  • availability of hardware decoding
  • encoding speed (for all the supported color options on sd/hd/uhd content)
  • deccoding speed (for all the supported color options on sd/hd/uhd content)
  • lossless or not
  • encoded size (for all the supported color options on sd/hd/uhd content)
As a side note: FFV1 does also support 4:2:2, 4:4:4, Hybrid just doesn't offer to enforce a specific color sampling. Hybrid sticks with the color sampling it gets.

Cu Selur
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Codec Speed vs Size Tests - by shijan - 11.09.2021, 11:11
RE: Codec Speed vs Size Tests - by Selur - 11.09.2021, 11:15
RE: Codec Speed vs Size Tests - by shijan - 11.09.2021, 11:35
RE: Codec Speed vs Size Tests - by Selur - 11.09.2021, 11:47
RE: Codec Speed vs Size Tests - by shijan - 11.09.2021, 12:01
RE: Codec Speed vs Size Tests - by Selur - 11.09.2021, 12:04
RE: Codec Speed vs Size Tests - by shijan - 11.09.2021, 14:49

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)