This forum uses cookies
This forum makes use of cookies to store your login information if you are registered, and your last visit if you are not. Cookies are small text documents stored on your computer; the cookies set by this forum can only be used on this website and pose no security risk. Cookies on this forum also track the specific topics you have read and when you last read them. Please confirm whether you accept or reject these cookies being set.

A cookie will be stored in your browser regardless of choice to prevent you being asked this question again. You will be able to change your cookie settings at any time using the link in the footer.

No option for x264 10 bit
#11
OK, strange that it works in Voukoder?  I can set CRF 0 and then tune the VBV-maxrate and the encode uses it.  Maybe it was ignoring the crf=0, though.  That is possible.

What is strange is that I cannot access the vbv-maxrate settings using any combination of encoding mode settings.  Can I not use that with x264 in Hybrid?
Reply
#12
I strongly doubt that.
Lossless encoding and vbv do not make sense logically. Smile
x264 itself does not care about vbv if you use lossless encoding, which is why you can not enable it in Hybrid when lossless encoding is used.
If you want vbv use crf or 2pass encoding.
(read the x264 source code if you think I'm wrong)

Cu Selur
----
Dev versions are in the 'experimental'-folder of my GoogleDrive, which is linked on the download page.
Reply
#13
(06.09.2023, 18:27)GlitterKill Wrote: That is x265.  I am trying to do this in x264.  I can do it with Voukoder just fine.  There has to be a way to do it in Hybrid.  I want to use x264 since it encodes much faster than x265.

yeah

you may not believe...

264 codec - each "frame" from a video stream, that is, from a container with FPS and resolution. Each "Frame" breaks / divides into 8 pieces / blocks and processes them.

265 codec uses the same frame, splits it into the same 8 chunks/blocks, and then additionally splits/divides each chunk/block into 4 chunks/blocks.
Reply
#14
I absolutely believe you.  Sorry I was not more clear in my last message... I was sort of thinking out loud as I posted... realizing that the CRF value was ignored.  Smile

Yes, it was illogical to try it, too.  I was just curious to see what it would do.  Experimenting to keep intermediate file sizes down.  I FINALLY just went with ProRes LT.  Been working good for me so far.  I'm not doing anything in 4K.  Smile
Reply
#15
(07.09.2023, 20:27)GlitterKill Wrote:
I absolutely believe you.  Sorry I was not more clear in my last message... I was sort of thinking out loud as I posted... realizing that the CRF value was ignored.  Smile

Yes, it was illogical to try it, too.  I was just curious to see what it would do.  Experimenting to keep intermediate file sizes down.  I FINALLY just went with ProRes LT.  Been working good for me so far.  I'm not doing anything in 4K.  Smile

Weird...
I have CRF and Quantizer working at 264 422 10bit
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)