27.10.2023, 21:05
Thank you for writing that out. I can't say I perfect understand everything, but I think I understand most of the general concepts of what you've explained. Am I understanding correctly that the main benefit of IVTC would primarily be more compact files (due to the removal of unnecessary frames), but wouldn't yield a benefit in image quality?
If so, given the enormous variety of content I have to get through, and how much analysis time it would take to assess all of it, I might just stick with the more broad-brush approach of using QTGMC and accept I will be unnecessarily storing extra frames.
If I take the QTGMC approach, is the best way to have the "lightest touch" on the media to choose veryslow/placebo and check the "show noise" box to prevent noise reduction? My goal is to deinterlace at the best quality, but not do any additional processing beyond that, because the trained AI upscaling models I will be using afterward will probably take care of noise removal and other image enhancement operations more intelligently than QTGMC would.
If so, given the enormous variety of content I have to get through, and how much analysis time it would take to assess all of it, I might just stick with the more broad-brush approach of using QTGMC and accept I will be unnecessarily storing extra frames.
If I take the QTGMC approach, is the best way to have the "lightest touch" on the media to choose veryslow/placebo and check the "show noise" box to prevent noise reduction? My goal is to deinterlace at the best quality, but not do any additional processing beyond that, because the trained AI upscaling models I will be using afterward will probably take care of noise removal and other image enhancement operations more intelligently than QTGMC would.