Deoldify Vapoursynth filter

[Selur]

Nice, then it was just a packaging mistake.

Cu Selur

[Selur]

btw.: https://web.law.duke.edu/cspd/publicdomainday/2025/ new stuff is public domain

[hallomanbh]

Happy New Year .Thanks to ALL

recent update Reference frames "ColorMnet" video colorization working good . without any error . 1st image original image from video 2nd image  refernce based colorization

[Dan64]

Hello Selur,

  I just released the new vs-deoldify version v4.6.0
  
In the new version I added 2 new color models under DDcolor:
    Real-Time User-Guided Image Colorization with Learned Deep Priors (Zhang, 2017)
   Colorful Image Colorization (Zhang, 2016) 

these 2 models has been added as additional models: siggraph17, eccv16, in DDcolor since have in common the same settings and tweaks.

On first use the following pytorch models will be downloaded:

• colorization_release_v2-9b330a0b.pth
  
• siggraph17-df00044c.pth
  

In vs-deoldify the torch hub directory is in: Hybrid\64bit\Vapoursynth\Lib\site-packages\vsdeoldify\models

You can install the new version with the command

.\python -m pip install https://github.com/dan64/vs-deoldify/releases/download/v4.6.0/vsdeoldify-4.6.0-py3-none-any.whl

No additional packages are necessary.

To add the new models in Hybrid GUI is just enough that you add the new DDcolor models 2 & 3 as described in the description of parameter DDcolor-model contained in the ddcolor_p list:

DDColor-model to use (default = 1):
    0 = ddcolor_modelscope,
    1 = ddcolor_artistic
    2 = colorization_siggraph17
    3 = colorization_eccv16

I hope that you have time to add them.

Thanks
Dan

[Selur]

I'll try to look into it.
A bit confused.
a. if this is a modification of DDColor, shouldn't DDColor get adjusted?
b. if this has nothing to do with DDColor, shouldn't the parameters&co get renamed?

Cu Selur

[Dan64]

To simplify the development on my side, and I hope also on your side.
From the point of view of the GUi are just 2 additional models other that "modelscope" and "artististic".

In the HAVC_ddeoldify when are used the model 2 and 3 in ddcolor_p, like in:

clip = HAVC_ddeoldify(clip=clip, method=1, ddcolor_p=[2, 16, 1, 0, True], ddtweak=False)
or
clip = HAVC_ddeoldify(clip=clip, method=1, ddcolor_p=[3, 16, 1, 0, True], ddtweak=False)

will use the new "Colorizer" code and not DDcolor.

The 2 new models have the same instability problems than DDcolor, in this way I can use the filters already developed to stabilize DDcolor, to stabilize also the siggraph17 and eccv16 color models.

I will post a comparison in the thread HAVC Filter User Guide 

Dan

[Selur]

Created a new Hybrid_deoldify which adds the new models as choice.

Cu Selur

[Dan64]

The new models has been added on DeOldify instead of DDcolor.
The models should be added with index 2 and 3 as described below

DDColor-model to use (default = 1):
    0 = ddcolor_modelscope,
    1 = ddcolor_artistic
    2 = colorization_siggraph17
    3 = colorization_eccv16

Please fix it.

Dan

[Selur]

Before I used:

values.clear();
  values << QString("Video");
  values << QString("Stable");
  values << QString("Artistic");
  this->addListField(QString("vsDeOldifyModel"), values.at(0), values, true);

and assumed you just added models.
But you also changed the old models.
And changed the defaults, thus invalidating any old settings for this in Hybrid.
Changed it now to:

values.clear();
  values << QString("ModelScope");
  values << QString("Artistic");
  values << QString("Siggraph 17");
  values << QString("ECC v16");
  this->addListField(QString("vsDeOldifyModel"), values.at(1), values, true);

and updated the Hybrid_deoldify download. Hopefully this works now as requested.

Cu Selur

[Dan64]

I think that there is a misunderstanding. You should change the list "vsDDColorModel" (or something similar)

Your version changed the DeOldify list



while DeOldify should be left untouched as shown below



Instead the 2 new models should be added to DDColor as shown below



Please fix it.

Dan