Posts: 10.555
Threads: 57
Joined: May 2017
too many artifacts, to do much,...
----
Dev versions are in the 'experimental'-folder of my GoogleDrive, which is linked on the download page.
Posts: 278
Threads: 61
Joined: Mar 2020
(06.04.2020, 17:55)Selur Wrote: too many artifacts, to do much,...
why you dont use Avisynth, instead of vapoursynth
and could you do some screenshot of the settings every step like this, i need the setting screenshots very much, because i want to get the same video result, but i can't get that through your guide by myself, thank you
1. QTGMC and preset 'Slow'
2. SMDegrain with default values (there are probably better filters that could be used on the source, but I used SMDegrain to remove some noise; there are lots of artifacts in the source, that should be filtered for a proper reencode)
3. Cropped
4. Resized to 2160x1464 using NNEDI3
Posts: 10.555
Threads: 57
Joined: May 2017
Quote:why you dont use Avisynth, instead of vapoursynth
I prefer Vapoursynth since:
a. Hybrid uses 64bit Vapoursynth version; Hybrid uses 32bit Avisynth since some filters are only available as 32bit versions
b. in my experience Vapoursynth is often faster if you have 4+cores. (on my cpu I have 16 logical cores)
c. gpu filters make less problems in Vapoursynth
d. some filters like gpu supported NNEDI3 are only available for Vapoursynth which can speed up quite a few filter scripts like QTGMC.
--
As a side note: I'm relatively sure that my filter and setting choice was far from perfect so if you spend the time to learn how to tweak the filters and when to try which filters there is still some room. That said, there won't be any miracles.
Cu Selur
----
Dev versions are in the 'experimental'-folder of my GoogleDrive, which is linked on the download page.
Posts: 278
Threads: 61
Joined: Mar 2020
(06.04.2020, 18:53)Selur Wrote: Quote:why you dont use Avisynth, instead of vapoursynth
I prefer Vapoursynth since:
a. Hybrid uses 64bit Vapoursynth version; Hybrid uses 32bit Avisynth since some filters are only available as 32bit versions
b. in my experience Vapoursynth is often faster if you have 4+cores. (on my cpu I have 16 logical cores)
c. gpu filters make less problems in Vapoursynth
d. some filters like gpu supported NNEDI3 are only available for Vapoursynth which can speed up quite a few filter scripts like QTGMC.
--
As a side note: I'm relatively sure that my filter and setting choice was far from perfect so if you spend the time to learn how to tweak the filters and when to try which filters there is still some room. That said, there won't be any miracles.
Cu Selur
OK, thank you . and why using slow mode of QTGMC, the more slow ,the better quality can get? if i using Avisynth QTGMC slow mode, is better than Fast mode? but spend much time?
Posts: 10.555
Threads: 57
Joined: May 2017
Slower modes in QTGMC usually preserve more quality, but try for yourself if you don't see the difference stick with a faster preset.
Cu Selur
----
Dev versions are in the 'experimental'-folder of my GoogleDrive, which is linked on the download page.
Posts: 278
Threads: 61
Joined: Mar 2020
(06.04.2020, 19:00)Selur Wrote: Slower modes in QTGMC usually preserve more quality, but try for yourself if you don't see the difference stick with a faster preset.
Cu Selur
i using this custom settings from internet right now,but i don't know how to set like SLOW mode to preserve more quality
and if you using 2080ti graphic card for the Video Enhance AI, every two seconds can done 1 frame, that's to say within 24 hours can do a long film, otherwise using CPU needs more than about four weeks for 4K, Video Enhance AI only support NVIDIA right now, the card level below GTX1080 will force using CPU to work only.
Posts: 10.555
Threads: 57
Joined: May 2017
You already are using 'Placebo' inside the custom settings on the right under 'Preset' you can set a base preset.
Cu Selur
----
Dev versions are in the 'experimental'-folder of my GoogleDrive, which is linked on the download page.