24.12.2022, 06:23
26.12.2022, 20:49
@humanoid86: No clue why you have to insult me by calling me a liar.
I am eager to learn why this clip is not soft telecined, when:
a. deinterlacing it shows typical repeated frames like when deinterlacing a 3:2 pulldown (= telecined) clip. (you can see that in your own clip)
b. Analysing the clip with DGIndex shows just progressive files with frame structure. Using 'ForceFilm'/soft-telecine properly handles the clip.
c. MediaInfo reports it as:
Do you think the clip is not soft telecined? Can you elaborate on why you think I'm a liar?
(Sorry, but I don't really care why you think I'm crazy or why you even post here at all.)
Cu Selur
I am eager to learn why this clip is not soft telecined, when:
a. deinterlacing it shows typical repeated frames like when deinterlacing a 3:2 pulldown (= telecined) clip. (you can see that in your own clip)
b. Analysing the clip with DGIndex shows just progressive files with frame structure. Using 'ForceFilm'/soft-telecine properly handles the clip.
c. MediaInfo reports it as:
Code:
Scan type : Progressive
Scan order : 2:3 Pulldown
(Sorry, but I don't really care why you think I'm crazy or why you even post here at all.)
Cu Selur
27.12.2022, 13:17
(22.12.2022, 13:55)humanoid86 Wrote: [ -> ]catch https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Ejg7t7a...sp=sharing
1080p 30.0 fps
27.12.2022, 13:22
I got that file, and it has the typical repeated frame (A B C D D) that you get when you deinterlace telecined or soft telecined content.
Cu Selur
Cu Selur
27.12.2022, 13:47
(27.12.2022, 13:22)Selur Wrote: [ -> ]I got that file, and it has the typical repeated frame (A B C D D) that you get when you deinterlace telecined or soft telecined content.
Cu Selur
lol
i wrote about this
and after my message you began to be clever
27.12.2022, 14:05
Excuse me, but where did you write about this?
You wrote:
=> I have no clue where you think that you wrote about that the source being soft telecined (3:2 pulldown) and that your deinterlaced encode contains duplicates, but it was not here.
Cu Selur
You wrote:
Quote:catch https://drive.google.com/file/d/...source: https://forum.selur.net/thread-2993-post...l#pid17577 (22.12.2022, 13:55)
let me know when you download
then I will delete the file and the comment
...
I always change the codec - the first step - to the one that is needed
Quote:without --- NONE --- de-interlacedsource: https://forum.selur.net/thread-2993-post...l#pid17579 (23.12.2022, 04:58)
Quote:liar https://drive.google.com/file/d/...source: https://forum.selur.net/thread-2993-post...l#pid17581 (23.12.2022, 07:40)
Quote:I already wrote that you are lazysource: https://forum.selur.net/thread-2993-post...l#pid17583 (23.12.2022, 08:57)
and a liar too
Quote:omg - meine Gütesource: https://forum.selur.net/thread-2993-post...l#pid17587 (24.12.2022, 06:23)
Quote:1080p 30.0 fpssource: https://forum.selur.net/thread-2993-post...l#pid17608
Quote:lolsource: https://forum.selur.net/thread-2993-post...l#pid17610
i wrote about this
and after my message you began to be clever
=> I have no clue where you think that you wrote about that the source being soft telecined (3:2 pulldown) and that your deinterlaced encode contains duplicates, but it was not here.
Cu Selur
27.12.2022, 14:35
omg - you are very VIP
I'm leaving
I'm leaving