Selur's Little Message Board

Just the idea:
- keep old single row VS tabs.
- shorten some names (DeBlocker -> DeBlock) to save some space. You may just divide groups
- add subgroups if required.
- divide filter sub groups inside each tabs with line or with shades of grey

I will think about it.
That may end up with sub-groups one visible when scrolling down.

Another very common option is sup groups with arrows to hide and show them. But in most cases i have no idea why hide those subgroups.
For example this is how it looks in PhotoLine image editor:

tried that a few days ago:
a. looks horrible in my eyes
b. doesn't really save space

Cu Selur

Ps.: added screenshots from mock-ups (taken in Windows), I once used menus instead of a combo box, but that really is a pain in MacOS since for MacOS menus are only supported at the top in a widget, so you have to write your own stuff which needs to change with each larger OS change.

Any idea what could caus TeamViewer preview to be distorted like this?

Restarted and reinstalled TeamViewer, but the distorted view is still present.

Cu Selur

This one looks nice:
https://forum.selur.net/attachment.php?aid=1238

Personally, I prefer

but if more users report that they prefer the other view I can adjust Hybrid.

Cu Selur

Organization vs speed:
Four rows tabs structure looks more accurate and each sub group looks well separated. 
Cons: 
It require more clicks to reach each filter.
impossible to check quickly globally which filters are enabled or disabled.

3 rows tabs structure allow very fast navigation across all sub grouped filters with scroll. Easy to inspect quickly which filters are selected or deselected.
Cons:
Layout visually look less pretty and less accurate.
In some tabs too long filters list may be not too easy to scroll inside too slim window height.

(02.01.2021, 09:55)Selur Wrote: [ -> ]Any idea what could caus TeamViewer preview to be distorted like this?




Restarted and reinstalled TeamViewer, but the distorted view is still present.

Cu Selur

Sorry for the delayed response. 

Ummm. Could be a bad screen resolution setting in mac os?

On teamviewer app, there is a settings pane where you can change the resolutions. And if you can’t then there is always terminal. 

Try that,

Question about a bluray

It is the movie oklahoma! 1955
It is apparently filmed at 30 FPS (made in 1955 and they were experimenting with frame rates)

It was remastered for the bluray.
But bluray spec doesn’t have 1080p/30 only 
So they made it interlaced 1080i/59.94 (i wonder if they doubled the frame rate and labeled them as fields? And then encoded them as interlaced?)
When i get info it shows up as 1080i/29.97 on the avc file.

I think i can get it back to 1080p/30 fps.
Using qtgmc to double the frames followed by srestore frate=30.

Interesting thing is. The video isn’t combed. Like it doesn’t look interlaced when playing the raw m2ts file.
I think that is causing qtgmc to fail because it isn’t truly interlaced. 

Any advice would be helpful. Thanks

---

Video
ID : 1
Format : AVC
Format/Info : Advanced Video Codec
Format profile : High@L4.1
Format settings, CABAC : Yes
Format settings, ReFrames : 4 frames
Codec ID : V_MPEG4/ISO/AVC
Duration : 2 h 28 min
Bit rate mode : Variable
Maximum bit rate : 38.5 Mb/s
Width : 1 920 pixels
Height : 1 080 pixels
Display aspect ratio : 16:9
Frame rate mode : Constant
Frame rate : 29.970 (30000/1001) FPS
Color space : YUV
Chroma subsampling : 4:2:0
Bit depth : 8 bits
Scan type : MBAFF
Scan type, store method : Interleaved fields
Scan order : Top Field First
Language : English
Default : No
Forced : No